Publications

CIAT. 2019. LandscapeCPR: Collective, Participatory Restoration of Smallholder Agricultural Landscapes. CIAT Publication No. 490. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Nairobi, Kenya. 21 p.

Khususiyah N; Suyanto S W; Buana R Y, 'Community Based Forest Management (PHBM): improving welfare and income equity for poor farmers on the forest margins', 2010

Muthoni, Rachel. 2007. Building capacity in participatory monitoring and evaluation in NARES [on line]. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Kampala, UG. 2 p. (Highlights: CIAT in Africa no. 36)

Braslow, Juliet; Cordingley, Justine. 2016. Participatory mapping in Lushoto district, Tanzania. A case study. . International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, CO. 18 p.

Braslow, Juliet; Cordingley, Justine. 2016. Participatory mapping in the Upper Tana River Basin, Kenya . International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, CO. 12 p.

Sarah Schomers. (15/2/2012). Participatory SWOT analysis of institutional arrangements in the conservancies. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)

Supriadi M; Wibawa G; Joshi L, 'Participatory tree crops development: institutional and group dynamic analysis', 2008

Cullen, B., Duncan, A.J. and Snyder, K. 2011. Participatory Video: Capturing community perspectives on rain water management. Presented at the IFWF 3rd International Forum on Water and Food, Tshwane, 16 November 2011. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.

Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., Djoudi, H., Moeliono, M., Pham, T.T. and Wong, G.Y. 2021. The forest frontier in the Global South: Climate change policies and the promise of development and equity. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01602-1

Andrés Cisneros-Montemayor, Eddie Allison. (3/10/2019). Social equity and benefits as the nexus of a transformative Blue Economy: A sectoral review of implications

Le TT, Luu TTG, Simelton E, Le TLC, Duong MT, Le DH and Tong TH. Participatory Scenario Planning (PSP) Group Logbook for Facilitator. Wageningen, The Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).

Ordinola, M., Bernet, T., Manrique, K., Fonseca, C. (2007). Promoviendo Innovaciones con los Actores de la Cadena y Revalorizar la Biodiversidad de la Papa. El Desarrollo y Aplicación del Enfoque Participativo de Cadenas Productivas (EPCP) en el Perú. Centro Internacional de la Papa, Lima, Perú. 55 pp.

Ekowati, D., Hofstee, C., Praputra, A.V., Sheil, D.. 2016. Motivation Matters : Lessons for REDD+ Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification from Three Decades of Child Health Participatory Monitoring in Indonesia. PLoS ONE, 11 (11) : e0159480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159480

Hugo Remaury. (31/3/2013). ‘Participatory mapping’ for land and water management (Iran). Beirut, Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)

Cullen, B. and Snyder, K. 2013. Participatory agricultural research in CGIAR: Challenges and opportunities. Presented at the Expert meeting on participatory agricultural research: Approaches, design and evaluation, Oxford, 9-13 December 2013. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.

Bezaiet Dessalegn, Ludmilla Kiktenko, Balzhan Zhumagazina; Saltanat Zhakenova; Vinay Nangia. 2016. Participatory Valuation of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study.

Nayak D; Sahoo A K; Singh V P, 'Creating Livelihood Opportunities for Women through Agroforestry Systems', 2018

Kouamé-Sina, S.M. 2013. Contribution à la gestion des risques de contamination microbienne et diversité génotypique des espèces du genre Bifidobacterium isolées de la chaine de production du lait local à Abidjan. PhD thesis. Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: Université Nangui-Abrogoua.

Louman, B., Primo, L., Pasiecznik, N., Mawesti, D., Sampene, E.. 2021. Investment cases for inclusive food systems: How international finance can better meet local needs and aspirations. GLF White Paper.

Hoffmann, Vivian; Awonon, Josue; Gelli, Aulo, 'Poultry production in Burkina Faso: Potential for poverty reduction and women’s empowerment', International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 2020

Strategic Research: Gender Workshop

Kristjanson, Patricia; Larson, Anne; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 'Analyse des approches et des résultats en matière de genre, de sécurisation des droits fonciers et de gouvernance des paysages: Leçons tirées de huit années de recherche', International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 2021

Gnych, S., Lawry, S., Monterroso, I., Adhikary, A. 2018. Common benefits: Is community tenure facilitating investment in the commons for inclusive and sustainable development?.: 2018 WORLD BANK CONFERENCE ON LAND AND POVERTY, The World Bank - Washington DC, March 19-23, 2018.

Khadka, M et al., 'Understanding barriers and opportunities for scaling sustainable and inclusive farmer-led irrigation development in Nepal', CSISA, 2021

de Brauw, Alan; Berber, Kramer; Murphy, Mike, 'Migration, labor and women’s empowerment: Evidence from an agricultural value chain in Bangladesh', World Development, vol. 142():105445, p. 105445, Elsevier BV, 2021

Carvalheiro, K. de O., Sabogal, C., Amaral, P. 2008. Análise da legislacao para o manejo florestal por produtores de pequeña escala na Amazônia brasileira . Belem, Brazil, CIFOR and IMAZON. 98p

Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M.F., Kweka, D. . 2013. Quem deve se beneficiar e por que? : Discursos sobre a reparticao de beneficios de REDD+. In Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. and Verchot, L. (eds). Analise de REDD+: Desafios e escolhas : 129-152. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Sunderlin, W.D. . 2014. Por qué la tenencia es clave para cumplir los objetivos climáticos y éticos de REDD+ : 4p. CIFOR REDD+ Safeguards Brief No. 3. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). http://dx.doi.org/10.17528/cifor/005190

Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M.F., Kweka, D. . 2013. ¿Quien debe beneficiarse y por que? : Discursos sobre la distribucion de los beneficios de REDD+. In Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. and Verchot, L. (eds). Análisis de REDD+: Retos y opciones : 129-152. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

NAFRI, IRD, CIFOR . 2012. Participatory land use planning : Handbook and Toolbox. Vientiane, Lao PDR: NAFRI, IRD, CIFOR.